🔗 Share this article

Loved ones whose relatives laid to rest in graves vulnerable to coastal erosion state that indecision on how best to tackle the problem is causing them avoidable anguish concerning the final resting places of their departed family.

An Impending Danger to Ancient Graveyards

The council have singled out three church graveyards in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being at risk of being swallowed by the sea in the coming decades.

A newly published study on the issue details a series of options, from taking no action to exhuming remains and relocating them in more secure sites. Officials maintain it is for the community to determine how to move forward.

“At the moment we’re in a state of uncertainty. It upsets me. They intended this to serve as their final resting place, but it won't be because of the encroaching sea.”

Projections suggest at least part of one graveyard could be claimed by the sea in the next 80 years, but some residents fear it will happen much sooner. “In my view it’s got less than 20 years, if you look at what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Haunted by the Ghosts of Eccles

One resident recalled a school trip to the nearby settlement of Eccles, which has almost entirely disappeared into the water, including its place of worship and burial ground.

“It was possible to see human remains,” she said. “Certain people hold this idealized notion that people’s remains will just get washed out to the ocean. They won’t. Individuals will take bones as souvenirs and go grave robbing looking for valuables. It’s completely disrespectful.”

“I’m worried that the same thing that befell at Eccles will occur here and there’ll be skeletons on the shore. I would feel appalled by that.”

A Paratrooper's Grave in Peril

Further up the shoreline is situated the grave of a ex-soldier who died while serving abroad. His mother said she lost sleep after learning her child's final plot might one day be moved.

“It truly disturb me to think this won’t be his permanent resting place,” she said. “For us it’s an significant place to go.”

In her view, new burials should stop but says it is premature to exhume existing graves. “My preference for now is to do nothing and watch carefully, but an early decision must be made when a critical moment has been attained.”

Searching for Answers and Clarity

The lack of agreement over when and how to handle the challenge has resulted in grieving relatives feeling exasperated and anxious.

Some want additional sea defences to delay the unavoidable loss and to permit funerals to proceed for now. Others argue the moment for relocation is drawing near.

“The situation is very emotive,” a family member stated. “The official study was really good, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is implemented. And all parties is avoiding responsibility over who is responsible.”

A local official said the burial sites were under the care of the local diocese. “Ultimately it is up to them to decide the path to take. Our role is here to help support them through that journey with communities.”

He added there was time to consider all the choices. “This concerns many years before it begins getting lost.”

“There is no unified opinion on what should happen yet. We need productive local conversations to find the appropriate answers for each village.”

The possibility of losing the churches and graveyards was described as one of “profound sorrow for the area,” but faith leaders also referenced a doctrine in resurrection, offering a theological viewpoint on the temporal disappearance of hallowed earth.